This is a comment you should use in respect to your own summaries; you should not do this to another person in response to a valid concern.
A brand new leadership position person has no problem dragging people through a billion meetings and emails; but these same people seem to respond to information they should find meaningful, by ignoring it by the depth of the topic itself.
I have met no more ignorant people - than those unwilling to listen to those who have the answers to the questions they themselves pose.
If I wrote something, and you chose to ignore the purpose of its meaning - then you should have asked again, I do not respond to your concerns, because I give a fuck - I do it out of a responsibility to inform you so you in turn can be responsible.
If your response to me being responsible, is to insult me - that is the end of my responsibilities to you; regardless of any perceived power you have over me... clearly you have decided to use me as an example, and abuse me (frankly with bad ideas and terrible information/data) - rather than respect me as a peer, who holds such information; and, by all means will prove it to you if you push the case.
I never understood a person who's put in a position of power... that feels the need to exhibit power through ignorance and humiliation - to force a bad answer, over a better one; out of spite... this is no definition of a leader.
A leader pays more attention than everyone else, not less ... they respond to every concern, even the trivial - for the health and wellbeing of people; and in acknowledgement that perhaps it is still yet your own ignorance.
This, sadly, is not reality.
Comments